Photo:1 Photo:2 Photo:3 Photo:4 |
| Definition | |
| 2>
An interpretation of M in N with parameters (or without parameters, respectively) is a pair (n,f) where n is a natural number and f is a surjective map from a subset of Nn onto M such that the f-preimage (more precisely the fk-preimage) of every set X ⊆ Mk definable in M by a first-order formula without parameters is definable (in N) by a first-order formula with parameters (or without parameters, respectively). Since the value of n for an interpretation (n,f) is often clear from context, the map f itself is also called an interpretation.
To verify that the preimage of every definable (without parameters) set in N is definable in M (with or without parameters), it is sufficient to check the preimages of the following definable sets:
the domain of N;
the diagonal of N;
every relation in the signature of N;
the graph of every function in the signature of N.
In model theory the term definable often refers to definability with parameters; if this convention is used, definability without parameters is expressed by the term 0-definable. Similarly, an interpretation with parameters may be referred to as simply an interpretation, and an interpretation without parameters as a 0-interpretation.
[edit] Tags:Model Theory,Signature,Definable,Graph,Interpretation,Set,Relation,Theory,First-order,Function,Subset,Domain,Model, | |
| Bi-interpretability | |
| 2>
If L, M and N are three structures, L is interpreted in M, and M is interpreted in N, then one can naturally construct a composite interpretation of L in N. If two structures M and N are interpreted in each other, then by combining the interpretations in two possible ways, one obtains an interpretation of each of the two structures in itself. This observation permits to define an equivalence relation among structures, reminiscent of the homotopy equivalence among topological spaces.
Two structures M and N are bi-interpretable if there exists an interpretation of M in N and an interpretation of N in M such that the composite interpretations of M in itself and of N in itself are definable in M and in N, respectively (the composite interpretations being viewed as operations on M and on N).
[edit] Tags:Structure,Homotopy Equivalence, | |
| Example | |
| 2>
The partial map f from Z × Z onto Q which maps (x, y) to x/y provides an interpretation of the field Q of rational numbers in the ring Z of integers (to be precise, the interpretation is (2, f)). In fact, this particular interpretation is often used to define the rational numbers. To see that it is an interpretation (without parameters), one needs to check the following preimages of definable sets in Q:
the preimage of Q is defined by the formula φ(x, y) given by ¬ (y = 0);
the preimage of the diagonal of Q is defined by the formula φ(x1, y1, x2, y2) given by x1 × y2 = x2 × y1;
the preimages of 0 and 1 are defined by the formulas φ(x, y) given by x = 0 and x = y;
the preimage of the graph of addition is defined by the formula φ(x1, y1, x2, y2, x3, y3) given by x1×y2×y3 + x2×y1×y3 = x3×y1×y2;
the preimage of the graph of multiplication is defined by the formula φ(x1, y1, x2, y2, x3, y3) given by x1×x2×y3 = x3×y1×y2.
[edit] Tags:Fact, | |
| References | |
| 2>
Logic portal
Ahlbrandt, Gisela; Ziegler, Martin (1986), "Quasi finitely axiomatizable totally categorical theories", Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 30: 63–82, doi:10.1016/0168-0072(86)90037-0, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TYB-45SJDHX-8&_user=10&_coverDate=01%2F31%2F1986&_rdoc=4&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%235614%231986%23999699998%23315074%23FLP%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=5614&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=6&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=dcedb9ab7620fe68560a9f68b586152f
Hodges, Wilfrid (1997), A shorter model theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-58713-6 (Section 4.3)
Poizat, Bruno (2000), A Course in Model Theory, Springer, ISBN 0-387-98655-3 (Section 9.4)
v
d
e
Logic
Overview
Academic
areas
Argumentation theory
Axiology
Critical thinking
Computability theory
Formal semantics
History of logic
Informal logic
Logic in computer science
Mathematical logic
Mathematics
Metalogic
Metamathematics
Model theory
Philosophical logic
Philosophy
Philosophy of logic
Philosophy of mathematics
Proof theory
Set theory
Foundational
concepts
Abduction
Analytic truth
Antinomy
A priori
Deduction
Definition
Description
Entailment
Induction
Inference
Logical consequence
Logical form
Logical implication
Logical truth
Name
Necessity
Meaning
Paradox
Possible world
Presupposition
Probability
Reason
Reasoning
Reference
Semantics
Statement
Strict implication
Substitution
Syntax
Truth
Truth value
Validity
Philosophical logic
Critical thinking
and
Informal logic
Analysis
Ambiguity
Argument
Belief
Bias
Credibility
Evidence
Explanation
Explanatory power
Fact
Fallacy
Inquiry
Opinion
Parsimony
Premise
Propaganda
Prudence
Reasoning
Relevance
Rhetoric
Rigor
Vagueness
Theories of deduction
Constructivism
Dialetheism
Fictionalism
Finitism
Formalism
Intuitionism
Logical atomism
Logicism
Nominalism
Platonic realism
Pragmatism
Realism
Metalogic and metamathematics
Cantor's theorem
Church's theorem
Church's thesis
Consistency
Effective method
Foundations of mathematics
Gödel's completeness theorem
Gödel's incompleteness theorems
Soundness
Completeness
Decidability
Interpretation
Löwenheim–Skolem theorem
Metatheorem
Satisfiability
Independence
Type–token distinction
Use–mention distinction
Mathematical logic
General
Formal language
Formation rule
Formal system
Deductive system
Formal proof
Formal semantics
Well-formed formula
Set
Element
Class
Classical logic
Axiom
Natural deduction
Rule of inference
Relation
Theorem
Logical consequence
Axiomatic system
Type theory
Symbol
Syntax
Theory
Traditional logic
Proposition
Inference
Argument
Validity
Cogency
Syllogism
Square of opposition
Venn diagram
Propositional calculus
and Boolean logic
Boolean functions
Propositional calculus
Propositional formula
Logical connectives
Truth tables
Predicate
First-order
Quantifiers
Predicate
Second-order
Monadic predicate calculus
Set theory
Set
Empty set
Enumeration
Extensionality
Finite set
Function
Subset
Power set
Countable set
Recursive set
Domain
Range
Ordered pair
Uncountable set
Model theory
Model
Interpretation
Non-standard model
Finite model theory
Truth value
Validity
Proof theory
Formal proof
Deductive system
Formal system
Theorem
Logical consequence
Rule of inference
Syntax
Computability theory
Recursion
Recursive set
Recursively enumerable set
Decision problem
Church–Turing thesis
Computable function
Primitive recursive function
Non-classical logic
Modal logic
Alethic
Axiologic
Deontic
Doxastic
Epistemic
Temporal
Intuitionism
Intuitionistic logic
Constructive analysis
Heyting arithmetic
Intuitionistic type theory
Constructive set theory
Fuzzy logic
Degree of truth
Fuzzy rule
Fuzzy set
Fuzzy finite element
Fuzzy set operations
Substructural logic
Structural rule
Relevance logic
Linear logic
Paraconsistent logic
Dialetheism
Description logic
Ontology
Ontology language
Logicians
Anderson
Aristotle
Averroes
Avicenna
Bain
Barwise
Bernays
Boole
Boolos
Cantor
Carnap
Church
Chrysippus
Curry
De Morgan
Frege
Geach
Gentzen
Gödel
Hilbert
Kleene
Kripke
Leibniz
Löwenheim
Peano
Peirce
Putnam
Quine
Russell
Schröder
Scotus
Skolem
Smullyan
Tarski
Turing
Whitehead
William of Ockham
Wittgenstein
Zermelo
Lists
Topics
Outline of logic
Index of logic articles
Mathematical logic
Boolean algebra
Set theory
Other
Logicians
Rules of inference
Paradoxes
Fallacies
Logic symbols
Portal
Category
Outline
WikiProject
Talk
changes
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interpretation_(model_theory)&oldid=442654059"
Categories: Model theory
Personal tools
Log in / create account
Namespaces
Article
Discussion
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
Actions
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact Wikipedia
Toolbox
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version
This page was last modified on 2 August 2011 at 10:30.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply.
See Terms of use for details.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.Contact us
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Mobile view
if ( window.isMSIE55 ) fixalpha();
if ( window.mediaWiki ) {
mw.loader.load(["mediawiki.user", "mediawiki.util", "mediawiki.page.ready", "mediawiki.legacy.wikibits", "mediawiki.legacy.ajax", "mediawiki.legacy.mwsuggest", "ext.gadget.wmfFR2011Style", "ext.vector.collapsibleNav", "ext.vector.collapsibleTabs", "ext.vector.editWarning", "ext.vector.simpleSearch", "ext.UserBuckets", "ext.articleFeedback.startup", "ext.articleFeedbackv5.startup", "ext.markAsHelpful"]);
}
if ( window.mediaWiki ) {
mw.user.options.set({"ccmeonemails":0,"cols":80,"date":"default","diffonly":0,"disablemail":0,"disablesuggest":0,"editfont":"default","editondblclick":0,"editsection":1,"editsectiononrightclick":0,"enotifminoredits":0,"enotifrevealaddr":0,"enotifusertalkpages":1,"enotifwatchlistpages":0,"extendwatchlist":0,"externaldiff":0,"externaleditor":0,"fancysig":0,"forceeditsummary":0,"gender":"unknown","hideminor":0,"hidepatrolled":0,"highlightbroken":1,"imagesize":2,"justify":0,"math":1,"minordefault":0,"newpageshidepatrolled":0,"nocache":0,"noconvertlink":0,"norollbackdiff":0,"numberheadings":0,"previewonfirst":0,"previewontop":1,"quickbar":5,"rcdays":7,"rclimit":50,"rememberpassword":0,"rows":25,"searchlimit":20,"showhiddencats":false,"showjumplinks":1,"shownumberswatching":1,"showtoc":1,"showtoolbar":1,"skin":"vector","stubthreshold":0,"thumbsize":4,"underline":2,"uselivepreview":0,"usenewrc":0,"watchcreations":1,"watchdefault":0,"watchdeletion":0,"watchlistdays":3,"watchlisthideanons":0,
"watchlisthidebots":0,"watchlisthideliu":0,"watchlisthideminor":0,"watchlisthideown":0,"watchlisthidepatrolled":0,"watchmoves":0,"wllimit":250,"flaggedrevssimpleui":1,"flaggedrevsstable":0,"flaggedrevseditdiffs":true,"flaggedrevsviewdiffs":false,"vector-simplesearch":1,"useeditwarning":1,"vector-collapsiblenav":1,"usebetatoolbar":1,"usebetatoolbar-cgd":1,"wikilove-enabled":1,"variant":"en","language":"en","searchNs0":true,"searchNs1":false,"searchNs2":false,"searchNs3":false,"searchNs4":false,"searchNs5":false,"searchNs6":false,"searchNs7":false,"searchNs8":false,"searchNs9":false,"searchNs10":false,"searchNs11":false,"searchNs12":false,"searchNs13":false,"searchNs14":false,"searchNs15":false,"searchNs100":false,"searchNs101":false,"searchNs108":false,"searchNs109":false,"gadget-wmfFR2011Style":1});;mw.user.tokens.set({"editToken":"+\\","watchToken":false});;mw.loader.state({"user.options":"ready","user.tokens":"ready"});
/* cache key: enwiki:resourceloader:filter:minify-js:4:b41a86ec4e0fe8329bc3ce917e792339 */
}
Tags:Stable,Hodges, Wilfrid,Cambridge University Press,Springer,Argumentation Theory,Axiology,Critical Thinking,Computability Theory,Formal Semantics,History Of Logic,Informal Logic,Logic In Computer Science,Mathematical Logic,Mathematics,Metalogic,Metamathematics,Philosophical Logic,Philosophy,Philosophy Of Logic,Philosophy Of Mathematics,Proof Theory,Set Theory,Abduction,Analytic Truth,Antinomy,A Priori,Deduction,Definition,Description,Entailment,Induction,Inference,Logical Consequence,Logical Form,Logical Implication,Logical Truth,Name,Necessity,Meaning,Paradox,Possible World,Presupposition,Probability,Reason,Reasoning,Reference,Semantics,Statement,Strict Implication,Substitution,Syntax,Truth,Truth Value,Analysis,Ambiguity,Argument,Belief,Bias,Credibility,Evidence,Explanation,Explanatory Power,Fallacy,Inquiry,Opinion,Parsimony,Premise,Propaganda,Prudence,Relevance,Rhetoric,Rigor,Vagueness,Theories Of Deduction,Constructivism,Dialetheism,Fictionalism,Finitism,Formalism,Intuitionism,Logical Atomism,Logicism,Nominalism,Platonic Realism,Pragmatism,Cantor's Theorem,Church's Theorem,Church's Thesis,Consistency,Effective Method,Foundations Of Mathematics,Gödel's Completeness Theorem,Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems,Soundness,Completeness,Decidability,Löwenheim–skolem Theorem,Metatheorem,Satisfiability,Independence,Type–token Distinction,Formal Language,Formation Rule,Formal System,Deductive System,Formal Proof,Well-formed Formula,Element,Class,Classical Logic,Axiom,Natural Deduction,Rule Of Inference,Theorem,Axiomatic System,Type Theory,Symbol,Traditional Logic, | |
z³ote monety |